Skip Ribbon Commands
Skip to main content
Belgium
Country of Decision : Belgium
Court Name : BE: Council for Alien Law Litigation [Conseil du Contentieux des Étrangers - CALL]
Date of decision : 09/03/2018
Type :
ECLI :
Case Number/Citation/ Document Symbol : no. 200 977

X. (Sudan) vs State Secretary of Asylum and Migration (Staatssecretaris voor Asiel en Migratie en Administratieve Vereenvoudiging)

This case addresses the interrelation of return and dublin procedures.

If it becomes apparent from Eurodac that an applicant has a request for protection filed in a Member State which is either pending, withdrawn or closed, allowing for his/her transfer to another Member State of the European Union under the Dublin III Regulation RvV X - he/she cannot opt ​​for a return decision and a to take a removal measure in application of the Return Directive

Dublin procedures; Return/Removal/Deportation;

Dublin Regulation III (Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 establishing the criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for IP); Return Directive (Directive 2008/115/EC of 16 December 2008 on common standards and procedures in Member States for returning illegally staying third-country nationals);

EASO Networks

Belgium,BE: Council for Alien Law Litigation [Conseil du Contentieux des Étrangers - CALL], X. (Sudan) vs State Secretary of Asylum and Migration (Staatssecretaris voor Asiel en Migratie en Administratieve Vereenvoudiging), 09/03/2018
BE: CALL rules on the interrelation of Return Directive and Dublin Procedures

https://caselaw.easo.europa.eu/pages/viewcaselaw.aspx?CaseLawID=496